Tossed To and Fro

You’ve tried Ezekiel Bread.

“Take wheat and barley, beans and lentils, millet and spelt; put them in a storage jar and use them to make bread for yourself.” (Ezekiel 4:9).

You’ve tasted Genesis 1:29 Bread.

Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.

You’ve done the Daniel Diet, based on Daniel 1:8-16:

But Daniel resolved not to defile himself with the royal food and wine, and he asked the chief official for permission not to defile himself this way. Now God had caused the official to show favor and compassion to Daniel, but the official told Daniel, “I am afraid of my lord the king, who has assigned your food and drink. Why should he see you looking worse than the other young men your age? The king would then have my head because of you.”

Daniel then said to the guard whom the chief official had appointed over Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah, “Please test your servants for ten days: Give us nothing but vegetables to eat and water to drink. Then compare our appearance with that of the young men who eat the royal food, and treat your servants in accordance with what you see.” So he agreed to this and tested them for ten days.

At the end of the ten days they looked healthier and better nourished than any of the young men who ate the royal food. So the guard took away their choice food and the wine they were to drink and gave them vegetables instead.

And still, you’re dissatisfied. You don’t really feel any better. And you don’t really feel any closer to God.

Well we’ve got some good news! It’s what you’ve been waiting for all along. The thing you’ve been missing! What is it that will finally make you a good and healthy person?

The John the Baptist Diet!

Yes, you too can eat like a prophet of God, a man who prepared the way for the Lord. A man who was willing to die for his faith—and did. It is a simple diet. Uncomplicated–since there are only two things you can eat when you’re on the John the Baptist Diet:

1. Honey

2. Grasshoppers

His food was locusts and wild honey. (Matthew 3:4b)

While you’re at it, you probably are feeling as if you need to make other changes in your life. Perhaps you feel as if modern fashion is unbecoming and dishonoring to God. Well, we’ve got some more great news for you!

Prophet Apparel!

Yes, you too can dress like a prophet. Choose our most popular line, The John the Baptist Collection: It’s simple. Sturdy. Obviously the kind of clothing God likes, since one of his most faithful servants wore it.

John’s clothes were made of camel’s hair, and he had a leather belt around his waist. (Matthew 3:4a)

Another favorite is The Isaiah Three Year Line, a clothing choice that God actually demanded of his prophet. Isaiah was obedient. Will you be obedient, too?:

isaiahbirthdaysuit

At that time the LORD spoke through Isaiah son of Amoz. He said to him, “Take off the sackcloth from your body and the sandals from your feet.” And he did so, going around stripped and barefoot. (Isaiah 20:2)

Or, perhaps, just perhaps, you’ll decide that maybe all these weird diets, foods and clothing choices have nothing to do with what you should eat or what you should wear–or with your relationship with God. Perhaps, just perhaps, you’ll realize that Jesus really paid for all your sins and there’s nothing left that you have to do to get closer to God. You’ve got as much of the Spirit and as much of God as you can get.

His divine power has given us everything we need for a godly life through our knowledge of him who called us by his own glory and goodness. Through these he has given us his very great and precious promises, so that through them you may participate in the divine nature, having escaped the corruption in the world caused by evil desires. (2 Peter 1:3-4)

You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? Before your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as crucified. I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by believing what you heard? Are you so foolish? After beginning by means of the Spirit, are you now trying to finish by means of the flesh? Have you experienced so much in vain—if it really was in vain? So again I ask, does God give you his Spirit and work miracles among you by the works of the law, or by your believing what you heard? So also Abraham “believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.” (Galatinas 3:1-6)

Perhaps, just perhaps, you will realize that all the passages about food and clothing have been wrenched out of context and not one of them means “go and do thou likewise.”

And perhaps, just perhaps, you’ll take to heart the words of Paul:

Then we will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of people in their deceitful scheming. (Ephesians 4:14)

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bible, Religion, Theology | Leave a comment

The Nearest Stars

Source SPACE.com: All about our solar system, outer space and exploration

Send to Kindle
Posted in Science, Space | Leave a comment

Falcon 9-R

The first demonstration launch of the new version of the Falcon 9, referred to as either the Falcon 9 v.1.1 or the Falcon 9-R launched successfully from Vandenberg AFB on Sunday, September 29, 2013 at 9:00 AM PDT. A report from the BBC states:

Retractable versions will now be incorporated on to the Falcon 9 that launches the company’s next Nasa cargo mission to the space station from Florida at the beginning of 2014. And again, once the first-stage has completed its primary tasks on that flight, it will be commanded to reignite its engines and to make a controlled return to Earth. But it won’t drop into the ocean. This time, the boost stage will try to touch down on a piece of ground at Cape Canaveral not far from the launch pad. SpaceX is currently working through the technicalities with range officials at the Cape, and with the Federal Aviation Authority. An FAA licence will be needed before such a landing is permitted.

This particular launch lacked the landing struts seen in the graphic below taken from SpaceX’s website: www.spacex.com/falcon9

facon9-r
Image and information taken from SpaceX.

Here is a video of what SpaceX intends to do and is making progress on:

Current testing with the Grasshopper test vehicle has gone well:

Send to Kindle
Posted in Science, Space, Technology | Leave a comment

Random Thoughts

Some random thoughts inspired by a question regarding stoning and the Bible from the editor of an online news site for which I do some consulting:

The Bible prescribes capital punishment for a variety of actions; stoning was one way of accomplishing capital punishment. We see capital punishment for murder, adultery, rape, Sabbath breaking, disobedience to parents, witchcraft, and idolatry. The Israelite laws are not unique among the law codes of the Ancient Near East in prescribing capital punishment for certain actions. It differs from other ANE law-codes in two things: the laws are applied equally to all members of society. There are not different laws for different classes. Second, the laws were intended to be proportional. The lex talionis, “eye for eye, tooth for tooth” was designed to limit punishments to being no worse than the offense.

Of course, from our modern vantage point, we don’t necessarily see that.

An individual who breaks the Sabbath (by gathering firewood on Saturday) shortly after the Sabbath was instituted by the Ten Commandments, is soon dispatched after a brief consultation with God. It is the only instance in the Bible of someone being executed for violating the Sabbath. For instance, Nehemiah, after the Babylonian captivity, simply berates the leaders of Jerusalem for their violations of the Sabbath, though he later does threaten “arrest.” (see Nehemiah 13:15-22)

For other crimes, for instance murder, the Bible describes several people who were guilty of the crime who nevertheless were not executed, ranging from Cain in Genesis 4 (before the Law was given), through Moses (who killed an Egyptian) to David, guilty of both murder and adultery. One might argue that their status protected them, though the law specified that the kings were no better than anyone else, and that they were subject to the same laws as anyone else (Deuteronomy 17:14-20).

Despite the condemnation of blasphemy in Leviticus 24:16, the only stories of blasphemers being condemned are criticisms by the religious establishment against Jesus and against the first Christian martyr when he was stoned. Stoning (and capital punishment in general) is not placed in a good light, for the most part, in the Bible, despite the law.

And while idolatry and worshiping gods other than Yahweh were considered capital crimes, we see idolatry and polytheism as endemic throughout Israel from the time of Joshua until the time of the Babylonian conquest (which the prophets blamed on the idolatry)—and rarely were people executed for worshipping other gods. The one exception that I can think of off the top of my head being the incident in 2 Kings 10:18-28 when Jehu gathers all the prophets, servants and priests of Baal and executes them, though using soldiers with swords rather than stoning. This, shortly after he had conducted a coup against the former king and royal family whom he had slaughtered. Oddly, however the prophet Hosea relates God’s words regarding the incident (the death of the royal family and prophets of Baal):

Then the Lord said to Hosea, “Call him Jezreel [Hosea’s son], because I will soon punish the house of Jehu for the massacre at Jezreel, and I will put an end to the kingdom of Israel.

This would suggest that God was not pleased by what Jehu had done, despite the fact that the incident, as described in 2 Kings 10:18-28 seems to have God’s blessing at the time. So perhaps this apparent paradox tells us something deeper about God’s attitudes and that there might have been a disconnect between what some the ancient Israelites thought God wanted versus what he really did want.

After all, the Bible, though it can be analyzed as just individual texts, books, and such, written by many individuals over many years and in many places, this might be a time to think about the Bible in its entirety, which is the record that has been bequeathed to us today: the biblical narrative as a whole, taken as a whole, has a point to make and that looking at the Bible as a whole gives us incites that looking at the individual pieces we might miss. Many interpreters of the Bible miss the forest for the trees as it were.

Matthew 22:35-40 gives us this incident from Jesus’ interaction with a religious leader:

One of them, an expert in the law, tested him with this question: “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”
Jesus replied: “ ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”

The point that the Bible is trying to make as a whole is that it all comes down to loving God and loving people. I would argue that any interpretation of the Bible or its parts that allows you to violate either of those prime commandments is necessarily in error. Go to Jail, do not pass go, do not collect 200 dollars. Notice, too, that the commandments to love God and to love your neighbor are quotations from the Old Testament (Deuteronomy 6:5 and Leviticus 19:18, both part of the Law of Moses): Jesus is not saying something new—he is arguing that it has been there the whole time, though people seem to have a lot of trouble hearing it and putting it into practice.

Paul reiterates the concept later in letters to local churches:

For the entire law is fulfilled in keeping this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” (Galatians 5:14)

Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for whoever loves others has fulfilled the law. The commandments, “You shall not commit adultery,” “You shall not murder,” “You shall not steal,” “You shall not covet,” and whatever other command there may be, are summed up in this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” Love does no harm to a neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law. (Romans 13:8-10)

Throughout the Bible love, mercy, and forgiveness are priorities (Micah 6:6-8, Isaiah 1:17, Jeremiah 22:3, Hosea 6:6, Zechariah 7:9-10, Matthew 9:3, Matthew 23:23, Mark 12:33, 1 John not killing people (see , as an example ). Some criticize the orders to exterminate the Canaanites, but one of the bigger stories in the book of Joshua is of the Canaanites who were not exterminated (thanks to their subterfuge Joshua 9). Instead, they were then protected and rescued by the Israelite army and by God making the sun and moon stand still (Joshua 10:6-15). Those who attempted to exterminate them were later punished (2 Samuel 21:1-9). It should also be pointed out that the Israelites never actually exterminated the Canaanites.

In John 8:3-11 the woman caught in adultery is spared thanks to Jesus—this despite the fact that adultery, according to Mosaic law, was a capital offense.

In that incident, and throughout the New Testament, stoning is always shown as a negative (along with capital punishment in general). Jesus was threatened with stoning, Stephen was martyred by stoning, Paul was stoned.

The problem with the FFRF and those who like to criticize the Bible as being evil, is that they miss the point that the Bible is trying to make. They are like people who mispronounce words by putting the emphasis on the wrong syllable. They focus their attention on the wrong things and miss the point all together.

I’ll end with the words of the author of 1 John:

Whoever claims to love God yet hates a brother or sister is a liar. For whoever does not love their brother and sister, whom they have seen, cannot love God, whom they have not seen. And he has given us this command: Anyone who loves God must also love their brother and sister. 1 John 4:20-21)

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bible, Theology, Writing | Leave a comment

Failure Mode

We will sometimes believe that we have failed, and perhaps we have. But that can be okay. Look at Joseph. In the book of Genesis, Joseph was a teenager. Next to the youngest son, he was favored by his father, which led to resentment from his older brothers. Their resentment was not lessened by his attitude: he tattled on them, and he told stories about how he was going to someday be their boss because of the dreams that God had given him.

So, one day, when the opportunity presented itself for the brothers to get rid of him, they took it: they sold him as a slave to some passing traders. The traders took him down to Egypt and sold him to one of the Pharaoh’s officials named Potifer.

He was a slave, but at least it was in a nice place; and he was an indoor slave, rather than working in the fields. So he accepted his lot, did his job, and performed his duties—and managed to do them so well that he was soon promoted to being the head slave, in charge of everything in the household. Still a slave, but he was in the best slot that a slave could get to.

And then Potifer’s wife started attempting to seduce him. When he refused, she accused him of attempted rape, which got him fired from being a slave. One might not think one could be more of a failure than being sold into slavery by your own brothers. Now, he had lost even that “job” and found himself bound and tossed into jail.

So, he accepted his lot and did as he was told, and somehow he managed to gain some responsibility and notoriety in the lockup, to the point that he became the top inmate, a trustee, running everything inside the walls, under the supervision of the warden.

Notice that his life has been a downward spiral: one step forward, two steps back. He’s constantly losing ground. He had been his father’s favorite, supervising his older brothers. Then he became a slave, but he managed to be a supervising slave. Then he got himself arrested, and now he’s a supervising prisoner. Things are definitely not looking up for him.

At the age of thirty, his prospects for upward mobility are gone. He has no career, and no prospects of ever getting one. His future is grim, and, based on his track record, likely to get grimmer. This, despite the fact that it was hard for him to see how things could get much worse. But then, he thought there couldn’t be anything worse than being a slave.

Boy, had he been wrong about that.

One day, a couple of men—a butler and a baker—who had, till then, served in the Pharoah’s palace got dumped in the prison. They suffered bad dreams—not surprising given the turns for the worse that their lives had taken—and they told Joseph their dreams.

Joseph interpreted them. The butler would be restored to his position. The baker, sadly, would be hanged. Joseph asked the butler to put in a good word for him with the Pharaoh, since Joseph was in prison unjustly.

And things happened just as Joseph predicted.

But the Butler just forgot all about Joseph. For three years.

Then, one day, Pharoah had a dream. When no one was successful at interpreting it, the Butler told him that he knew a man who would be able to help. The Butler recognized this as an opportunity to ingratiate himself with the Pharaoh (“see, I was the one who solved your problem!”) So, Pharaoh called Joseph from prison.

After Joseph got cleaned up and dressed up, he was presented before Pharaoh. He interpreted the dream, warning of a coming famine and suggesting a course of action to help the nation survive it. The Pharoah was impressed and put Joseph in charge of overseeing things, making Joseph second in command in the nation, second only to Pharaoh himself.

Later, when his starving brothers showed up, he tormented them a bit, before revealing himself and offering them a place to live in Egypt with him in prosperity. Though they were fearful that Joseph would seek vengeance, he explained that while what they had done, they had done to hurt him, and that indeed, he had suffered a lot over the years—he recognized that God had been at work through the whole thing: not only had he personally risen to a place of power and comfort, more importantly, he was able to save not just his family from starvation, but an entire nation. His decade or more of suffering had led to the salvation of millions. His seeming failure had, in fact, been a rousing success story: riches to rags and back again.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bible, Religion, Theology | Leave a comment

When There’s No Reason For Hope

After hoping that God would do something to fix the nation of Israel, and after learning from God that his “solution” is to have the nation suffer the destruction of a Babylonian invasion and conquest, the prophet Habakkuk is feeling unhappy and stressed. He concludes his book with a statement—or perhaps a prayer—for when nothing is going right, when everything is going wrong, and there doesn’t look to be anyway out and nothing about your circumstances make sense. This is for when you wonder where God is and why he has apparently forgotten you:

Though the fig tree does not bud
and there are no grapes on the vines,
though the olive crop fails
and the fields produce no food,
though there are no sheep in the pen
and no cattle in the stalls,
yet I will rejoice in the LORD,
I will be joyful in God my Savior.
The Sovereign LORD is my strength;
he makes my feet like the feet of a deer,
he enables me to tread on the heights. (Habakkuk 3:17-19)

When all you have is your faith in God, that’s a hard place to be. But it’s okay. God is there, whether you can feel him or see him or recognize his hand at work in your life. He’s there even when you think he couldn’t possibly be. He’s there even when you’re certain that it’s hopeless.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bible, Religion, Theology | Leave a comment

Sometimes Peace is Impossible

I went to my pharmacy a couple of days ago to pick up a prescription for my daughter. One person was ahead of me, an older woman—almost the stereotypical grandmother: white hair, glasses, slightly hunched. But she wasn’t acting like a grandmother doting on her granddaughter offering her cookies.

Instead, she was in full-throated roar yelling at the twenty-something technician behind the counter.

Why?

Because she was going to have to wait for her prescription. No explanation mattered to her; there was no ability of the poor technician to fix the situation. The technician spoke softly—she was a small, brown-haired young woman in a white jacket. She was unfailingly polite and gentle. But the old lady refused any attempt at mollification. She kept yelling and yelling, kept reiterating that she wanted her prescription now and that it was unreasonable for her to wait. “There’s no one ahead of me,” she insisted. Of course failing to notice that there were other prescriptions being filled and that the stacks of prescription orders were rather high; yes, no one else was physically standing in front of her. It doesn’t mean that no one was ahead of her.

When faced with a foe, it is only natural to want to understand them. After the initial shock of an attack, whether it’s a coworker who unloads on you out of the blue, or a family member, or just someone you came in contact with at the store—understanding helps.

So eventually it came out: “I have a toothache and that medicine will make it stop hurting.” There was the reason for her seemingly unreasoning rage.

And so, when we look at the world, we’d like to find the reason for the conflicts we find. Surely there is a way to bring peace to those at war. When 911 happened, the first instinct of many was to wonder “what did we do? How have we offended them?” We seek to find an explanation, to assign guilt to ourselves for our suffering. When we look at combatants in the Middle East, we want to believe that there are two good sides to the argument and that there must be some way to bring about a resolution to the conflict. Surely if we make certain changes in how we behave as a nation, make better choices, say nicer words, then those who hate us will learn to love us and we can enjoy peace and harmony.

But sometimes, it isn’t so complicated. Sometimes, those who hate us aren’t reacting to a toothache or some perceived, whether legitimate or not, slight. Sometimes, there is no way to resolve the conflict. Sometimes, there can be no peace.

Such, sadly, is the case of Al-Qaeda and frankly, the other Moslim extremists out there. Frankly, it is also the case when it comes to Israel and groups such as Hamas, Hezbollah, the Moslem Brotherhood and the like. Peace simply isn’t possible with those who want but one thing: for you to convert or die. There is no middle ground, nothing to give, no hope.

MEMRI.org recently published the following. Some people might want to ignore these words. Some people might want to believe that they aren’t really serious. Sadly, I don’t think these words give us any possibility of hope. Peace is impossible:

Al-Qaeda’s broadcasting arm Al-Sahab has released an audio lecture that sets the standards of friendship and enmity with infidels as defined by Islam. The lecture is delivered by Abdul Samad, a militant Pakistani cleric who speaks in Urdu.

The lecture is titled “Standards of Friendship and Enmity in Islam.” It was released through various jihadi forums with a link posted on the U.S.-based website Archive.org. Citing Koranic verses, Abdul Samad says Muslims should never form friendships and relationships with infidels, which is necessary for the success of Muslims in forming unity.

Citing hadiths and Koranic verses, Abdul Samad argues the following points:

i) The most powerful and binding relation is Islam.
ii) The believers, who do not disassociate themselves from nonbelievers and do not distinguish their ranks from people who have interest in worldly things, can never serve Islam effectively.
iii) Our friendship and enmity should only be for Allah’s cause.
iv) Our friendship, relationship and love should only be with the people who believe in Islam and Allah as the ruler.
v) The people, who do not accept Allah as the ruler and do not believe in Islam are our enemy and we should disassociate ourselves from them even if they are our close relatives and from our tribe.
vi) The infidels, whether they are the Jews or Christians, atheists and polytheists, are the real infidels and are the enemies of Allah’s faith (Islam).
vii) The Koran has termed friendship with Kuffar (infidels) as a sign of disunity and unbelief, as it is associated with the foundations of belief.
viii) The people declared by Allah as our enemy can never be our friends.
ix) The non-believers are the enemies of our elderly people, women and children. They kill the Muslims with bombs either in Kashmir, Iraq, or Palestine. There is hardly a day when a Muslim escapes their cruelty.
x) They open several fronts (against Muslims) after entering a region. One of their fronts is education. They used it in the Egypt and Turkey; and they currently use it in Pakistan against the Muslims.
xi) Our enmity towards Hindus is not due to the Kashmir issue; our enmity towards America is not due to Iraq and Afghanistan; the enmity between us and the Jews is not due to the Palestine; the real cause is that they do not accept our system and Islam.
xii) Our enmity towards them (the non-believers) will continue even if they renounce all their crimes.
xiii) Enmity towards infidels is a must. It is part of our faith. Islam says the Muslims should stay away from the infidels and their countries.
xiv) The best way to get rid of them (infidels) is to continue jihad until the Allah’s faith (Islam) is completely enforced all over the world.

See the full report: Al-Qaeda Releases ‘Standards Of Friendship And Enmity In Islam’

So.

They don’t hate us for our freedom.

They don’t hate us because we did something to them.

They hate us because we exist. Because we are infidels.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Culture, Religion | Leave a comment

Poetic License

When I teach biblical interpretation, one of the things I use to help explain the difference between biblical narrative and biblical poetry is to ask the students to compare Judges 4 and Judges 5. These two chapters make my job easy, because both chapters describe the same event: Barak and Deborah’s victory over Sisera.

I point out that the purpose of poetry is not to clearly describe events or to give us instructions. Instead, poetry is emotional; it gives us a feeling—it is not propositional. For instance, the Afordible Healthcare Law, usually called Obomacare, is not written in poetry. Likewise, autorepair manuals are not written in poetry, nor are history books or newspapers. But music lyrics are poetry—and what you expect from listening to the lyrics of songs is not what you expect when you’re listening to a news report on the latest horrors in Egypt.

So, consider the contrast between these two descriptions of the same event. First, Judges 4:17-21 which gives us the narrative form of the event:

Sisera, meanwhile, fled on foot to the tent of Jael, the wife of Heber the Kenite, because there was an alliance between Jabin king of Hazor and the family of Heber the Kenite.

Jael went out to meet Sisera and said to him, “Come, my lord, come right in. Don’t be afraid.” So he entered her tent, and she covered him with a blanket.

“I’m thirsty,” he said. “Please give me some water.” She opened a skin of milk, gave him a drink, and covered him up.

“Stand in the doorway of the tent,” he told her. “If someone comes by and asks you, ‘Is anyone in there?’ say ‘No.’ ”

But Jael, Heber’s wife, picked up a tent peg and a hammer and went quietly to him while he lay fast asleep, exhausted. She drove the peg through his temple into the ground, and he died.

Judges 5:24-27 relates the same event, but as poetry:

Most blessed of women be Jael,
the wife of Heber the Kenite,
most blessed of tent-dwelling women.
He asked for water, and she gave him milk;
in a bowl fit for nobles she brought him curdled milk.
Her hand reached for the tent peg,
her right hand for the workman’s hammer.
She struck Sisera, she crushed his head,
she shattered and pierced his temple.
At her feet he sank,
he fell; there he lay.
At her feet he sank, he fell;
where he sank, there he fell—dead.

Hebrew poetry is dependent on what is called parallelism—the rhyming of ideas rather than the rhyming of sounds, and thus it seems repetitious to modern western readers. What we would express in a single concept, perhaps with some added adjectives or adverbs, gets stated twice in slightly different words. More obviously, the death of Sisera is described much more violently, with Jael as violent, and overpowering him in an epic battle. The point of the poetry is to suggest the emotions of the event, rather to to give a blow by blow description of how the event occurred. It gives us insight into how Jael felt about what she did, and how the Israelites felt about it: how they saw it as a triumph over their humiliated opponent. Poetry makes more use of metaphor and allegory, the painting of pictures with words. One can get into a lot of trouble trying to understand poetry literalistically.

What is interesting to consider when you see the difference in poetry versus narrative is when it comes time to read the prophets of the Old Testament. Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, the 12 minor prophets—most of what they write, most of the “word of the Lord” is presented as poetry. Don’t read the prophets (or Psalms, or Proverbs) then the same way you’d read the narratives of 1 and 2 Chronicles; don’t expect them to give you the same sort of information.

Thus, be very careful how you understand what is going on. The same with the Psalms, Song of Solomon and the wisdom literature, such as Proverbs and Ecclesiastes: recognize that you’re dealing with poetry. Be careful to allow for unusual idioms and twists. For instance, the prophets will occasionally talk about “adultery” and how Israel or Judah are “adulterous.” The prophets are not talking about the behavior of married adults in ancient Palestine. Rather, the terms are used metaphorically to describe how unfaithful to God the Israelites have become. Instead of worshiping Yahweh exclusively, they’ve run off and started worshiping other gods as well, while still coming back to the Temple and going through the rituals as if nothing is wrong. “Adultery” is a perfect picture of the religious situation in Israel and Judah.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bible, Religion, Theology | Leave a comment

Comforting Context

In reading the Bible, as with reading anything, context is important. I don’t like to rain on people’s parades, but it disturbs me sometimes when I see people take a comforting passage and apply it to themselves or others as some sort of universal promise, but completely ignoring the actual context of the passage. Because of that, those sorts of verses don’t do a whole lot for me, not anymore. For instance, this passage from Jeremiah is a favorite:

For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the LORD, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. (Jeremiah 29:11)

While this passage is rarely invoked:

I will punish you as your deeds deserve,
declares the Lord.
I will kindle a fire in your forests
that will consume everything around you. (Jeremiah 21:14)

But the context of both is the same: God’s judgment on Judah at the hands of the Babylonians.

And of course it is easy to see why: Jeremiah 29:11 promises comfort and the idea that God has only good things in store for us. However, in context, the passage was given to the people of Israel as they were being carted off to captivity, assuring them that God would take care of them and bring them back. It is in the context of the contract God has with Israel, which promises punishment for disobedience because they are his people—and that they are his people, regardless of their actions.

Certainly it is in keeping with such New Testament passages as Romans 8:28:

And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose.

But even that is not a blanket promise that everything will be peaches and cream for us here. One should consider such passages as Hebrews 11:35-40:

There were others who were tortured, refusing to be released so that they might gain an even better resurrection. Some faced jeers and flogging, and even chains and imprisonment. They were put to death by stoning; they were sawed in two; they were killed by the sword. They went about in sheepskins and goatskins, destitute, persecuted and mistreated—the world was not worthy of them. They wandered in deserts and mountains, living in caves and in holes in the ground.

These were all commended for their faith, yet none of them received what had been promised, since God had planned something better for us so that only together with us would they be made perfect.

The promises of God are long term in both the passage in Jeremiah 29:11 and the one in Romans 8:28. We will prosper not because God will grant us jobs, houses, health and comfort here on Earth. Even if we have such things, it is certain that someday we will lose them all: we will grow old, we will grow sick, and we will die. The reason we will prosper is because we are part of God’s family and will live with him forever. It is in the kingdom—both the kingdom we experience now within us (Luke 17:20-21)—as well as in the future kingdom that prosperity is ours. Our hope is in God, not in now. Our comfort is in the fact that God is with us always, no matter what we face. We are never alone. And certainly it is the case that God has our best interests in mind. He loves us, and that’s what love is all about. So in that way, the passages in Jeremiah make sense as comfort: that God’s actions are always for our best.

“Which of you, if your son asks for bread, will give him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him! So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. (Matthew 7:9-12)

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bible, Religion, Theology | Leave a comment

Are You a Chew Toy?

gamelevels

It requires no effort to look at the broken mess of your latest attempts and to decide that you are a loser. It requires no skill, takes no strength, and uses no calories to lie flat on your back and say, “to hell with it.” Walking away, throwing in the towel, deciding that it’s no longer worth it is the simplest thing. Admitting that it was a stupid idea, taking all your marbles, and trudging off home is always the least you can do. Discouragement is the chew toy level on the game of life.

But how do you know when you should just give up? How do you know you’re not being a fool to keep on in a task that everyone knows is hopeless? Why continue the heartache? Why beat yourself bloody? You know it can’t be done, so why keep on?

Right?

As an author, these are the thoughts you will have to face regularly. Of course, they are the thoughts that are common to humanity—that everyone has to ask themselves. The student struggling to keep up in class, the new recruit in boot camp, the young woman struggling to learn a new dance step, the athlete trying to improve his time, the pitcher struggling to get his curve ball to work, the accountant pulling his hair out trying to find the discrepancy, the law student taking the BAR once again, the actor still waiting tables, waiting for another audition, the unemployed pounding the pavement and getting pounded for another fifteen weeks. Every day, we face the spot between the rock and the hard place and every day we have to decide: is it worth it?

As you consider the question, just remember always: the easy choice is to give up.

Is easy what you really want? Is your goal no longer desirable? Is it worth the cost or not?

Did you know the job was tough when you took it?

Really—what do you want?

If you have raced with men on foot
and they have worn you out,
how can you compete with horses?
If you stumble in safe country,
how will you manage in the thickets by the Jordan? (Jeremiah 12:5)

Send to Kindle
Posted in Writing | Leave a comment