Sadducees

Jesus was approached by some Sadducees—religious leaders who say there is no resurrection from the dead. They posed this question: “Teacher, Moses gave us a law that if a man dies, leaving a wife without children, his brother should marry the widow and have a child who will carry on the brother’s name. Well, suppose there were seven brothers. The oldest one married and then died without children. So the second brother married the widow, but he also died without children. Then the third brother married her. This continued with all seven of them, and still there were no children. Last of all, the woman also died. So tell us, whose wife will she be in the resurrection? For all seven were married to her.”

Jesus replied, “Your mistake is that you don’t know the Scriptures, and you don’t know the power of God. For when the dead rise, they will neither marry nor be given in marriage. In this respect they will be like the angels in heaven.

“But now, as to whether the dead will be raised—haven’t you ever read about this in the writings of Moses, in the story of the burning bush? Long after Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob had died, God said to Moses, ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.’ So he is the God of the living, not the dead. You have made a serious error.” (Mark 12:18-27)

Jesus told the Sadducees that their ignorance was showing. The Sadducees did not believe in the resurrection, because they believed only the first five books of the Bible, Genesis through Deuteronomy and could find nothing in those books about an afterlife. They did not believe the rest of the books of the Old Testament were authoritative scripture. According to the Law of Moses, if a man died childless, his brother was required to marry the widow. The first child born from the union would then carry on the name, and take the inheritance, of the dead man. The purpose of this law was to keep property in the dead man’s family.

To prove the existence of the resurrection, Jesus quoted from what the Sadducees accepted as scripture. Besides not understanding scripture, Jesus told them that they were blinded by their own culture. They were wrong to assume that the social relationships they knew in the present day would endure in the kingdom of God. The post-resurrection future with God would be nothing like the world. We can see the future only dimly: it will surprise us.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bible, Religion, Theology | Leave a comment

He returned from the region of Tyre, and went by way of Sidon towards the Sea of Galilee, in the region of the Decapolis. They brought to him a deaf man who had an impediment in his speech; and they begged him to lay his hand on him. He took him aside in private, away from the crowd, and put his fingers into his ears, and he spat and touched his tongue. Then looking up to heaven, he sighed and said to him, “Ephphatha,” that is, “Be opened.” And immediately his ears were opened, his tongue was released, and he spoke plainly. Then Jesus ordered them to tell no one; but the more he ordered them, the more zealously they proclaimed it. They were astounded beyond measure, saying, “He has done everything well; he even makes the deaf to hear and the mute to speak.” (Mark 7:31-37)

Jesus once healed a man by giving him a wet Willie. The Decapolis was a federation of ten cities in the area east of Samaria and Galilee, including the cities of Damascus and Philadelphia. It was an area that had a Greek culture more than a Hebrew culture and there were many non-Jewish people living in the area. After Jesus had healed the daughter of the gentile woman in Tyre, he traveled on to visit the region.
While there, some of the people there brought him a man who was deaf. Since he had an “impediment in his speech,” that likely meant that he was not born deaf, but had become deaf later in life. Since he could no longer hear himself talk, the clarity of his speech was affected.

Unlike so many of his healings, Jesus made a ritual of the process: he spat, touched the man’s tongue and stuck his fingers in his ears, besides uttering an Aramaic word which the man couldn’t have heard and probably wouldn’t have understood given that it was a Greek speaking region. Why so much rigmarole? Because the man’s friends had asked for it. They wanted Jesus to “lay his hand” on him. Jesus accommodated their expectations. Jesus works with us where we are, he comes to us in our situation and from there takes us to where we need to be. He does not insist on us changing before he changes us. This man and his friends needed the show. Jesus always gives us what we need.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bible, Religion, Theology | Leave a comment

Mercury

Source SPACE.com: All about our solar system, outer space and exploration

Send to Kindle
Posted in Science, Space, Technology | Leave a comment

A New Teaching

Suddenly, while still in the meeting place, he was interrupted by a man who was deeply disturbed and yelling out, “What business do you have here with us, Jesus? Nazarene! I know what you’re up to! You’re the Holy One of God, and you’ve come to destroy us!”

Jesus shut him up: “Quiet! Get out of him!” The afflicting spirit threw the man into spasms, protesting loudly—and got out.

Everyone there was incredulous, buzzing with curiosity. “What’s going on here? A new teaching that does what it says? He shuts up defiling, demonic spirits and sends them packing!” News of this traveled fast and was soon all over Galilee.

Directly on leaving the meeting place, they came to Simon and Andrew’s house, accompanied by James and John. Simon’s mother-in-law was sick in bed, burning up with fever. They told Jesus. He went to her, took her hand, and raised her up. No sooner had the fever left than she was up fixing dinner for them.

That evening, after the sun was down, they brought sick and evil-afflicted people to him, the whole city lined up at his door! (Mark 1:23-33)

When Jesus began his public ministry, the first miracle that got widespread attention was when he told a demon to leave a possessed man and the demon left. The response of witnesses was incredulity.

They said that Jesus gave “a new teaching.” Had no one cast out demons before? The difference was that Jesus’ words were backed up by actions. Jesus was more than just speeches—he was about doing something new and startling. Before Jesus arrived, casting out demons was a complex process, fraught by difficulty and ritual. Jesus just told the demon to leave—no theatrics, no formulas, no ritual. There was a power to Jesus that was unlike any of the other teachers they’d known up until then.

Jesus told the demon to be “quiet!” The only other place in Mark’s gospel account where Jesus used that particular verb was when he shut down a storm on the Sea of Galilee. Demons obeyed Jesus the same way the inanimate forces of nature obeyed him, or as a well-trained animal might obey its owner. Demons, like storms, were dangerous and powerful. For Jesus, they were nothing at all. Nothing is difficult for Jesus. Jesus doesn’t just offer us mere words. He offers us genuine solutions. He will move in and disrupt our lives—not just give us advice.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Not a Waste

Jesus was in the town of Bethany, eating at the home of Simon, who had leprosy. A woman came in with a bottle of expensive perfume and poured it on Jesus’ head. But when his disciples saw this, they became angry and complained, “Why such a waste? We could have sold this perfume for a lot of money and given it to the poor.”

Jesus knew what they were thinking, and he said:

Why are you bothering this woman? She has done a beautiful thing for me. You will always have the poor with you, but you won’t always have me. She has poured perfume on my body to prepare it for burial. You may be sure that wherever the good news is told all over the world, people will remember what she has done. And they will tell others. (Matthew 26:6-13)

We shouldn’t insist that God’s will for our lives is necessarily God’s will for everyone else. My dad was a career soldier in the Air Force. That was good for him. He didn’t believe it had to be good for me too. In the same town where his friends Lazarus, Mary and Martha lived, Jesus had a meal with Simon the leper. A woman poured expensive perfume on him.

Jesus’ disciples were upset that this woman had wasted money that could have been given to the poor. Jesus pointed out something that could seem very discouraging: “you will always have the poor with you.” Does that mean that all efforts to alleviate poverty will fail? Did Jesus suggest that the real waste of the perfume would have been to do with it what the disciples suggested?

Jesus point was not about the everlasting nature of poverty, but rather that his disciples wouldn’t always have him. Yes, the Holy Spirit would indwell them; yes, Jesus lives forever at the right hand of the Father. Yes, Jesus promised to “be” with them until the end of the world. But there was a vast difference between Jesus enjoying a meal with his disciples and being with them “in spirit.” Jesus knew he would soon be dying on the cross. It was a poignant time for him, but his disciples did not understand. Soon they would.

It is never a waste to do something special for those we love. Life is more than just giving to the poor or whatever other “good thing” our neighbor may believe we need to do.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bible, Religion, Theology | Leave a comment

Are We Taking Care of Jesus?

He will also say to those on the left, ‘Depart from Me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the Devil and his angels!

For I was hungry
and you gave Me nothing to eat;
I was thirsty
and you gave Me nothing to drink;
I was a stranger
and you didn’t take Me in;
I was naked
and you didn’t clothe Me,
sick and in prison
and you didn’t take care of Me.’

“Then they too will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or without clothes, or sick, or in prison, and not help You?’

“Then He will answer them, ‘I assure you: Whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for Me either.’

“And they will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.” (Matthew 25:41-46)

What if God were one of us? It’s a question that appears in Joan Osborne’s 1995 song, One of Us. Jesus was God and he did become one of us.

Those who do not take care of strangers, do not provide for the poor, sick and imprisoned, are not taking care of Jesus himself. Such people who ignore Jesus’ suffering are destined for the eternal fire that God prepared for Satan and his angels. The apostle John, in one of his letters, wrote that if we claim to love God but hate our neighbor, then we don’t actually love God. John was basing what he wrote on what Jesus himself said here.

Who does Jesus condemn in the harshest terms? The Pharisees and religious leaders who believed that the Messiah would come to destroy the wicked, such as the gentiles, the prostitutes, and the tax collectors. But who was it that mistreated the poor? Who took the homes of widows, put debtors in prison, and burdened men with rules they wouldn’t keep themselves? Mostly the rich and powerful Sadducees and Pharisees.

It tells us something about God’s priorities. Just as God’s prophets in the Old Testament condemned those ancient religious rulers for worshipping other gods and mistreating the poor and powerless, so Jesus condemned the leaders of his day for the same things. It reminds us, too, that those who belong to Jesus become part of Jesus. How we treat those others is how we treat Jesus.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bible, Religion, Theology | Leave a comment

Prepaid

Most will find the book of Leviticus very dull. And this is not surprising given that the book is essentially an instruction manual. I don’t know about you, but I have yet to seek out “how to use your new rice cooker” as something to entertain me. Leviticus is somewhat similar, except that it told the priests how to use their new tabernacle to worship God and to get rid of everyone’s sins.

From a theological point of view, it clarifies something. Whenever people sinned, they were to bring animals to the temple and the priests were to sacrifice them in order to make atonement for their sin. Sin, sacrifice, repeat as necessary. Every sin required its own, separate sacrifice.

If anyone sins and does what is forbidden in any of the LORD’s commands… .They are to bring to the priest as a guilt offering a ram from the flock, one without defect and of the proper value. In this way the priest will make atonement for them for the wrong they have committed… (Leviticus 5:17–19)

As the author of Hebrews points out:

The law is only a shadow of the good things that are coming—not the realities themselves. For this reason it can never, by the same sacrifices repeated endlessly year after year, make perfect those who draw near to worship. Otherwise, would they not have stopped being offered? For the worshipers would have been cleansed once for all, and would no longer have felt guilty for their sins. But those sacrifices are an annual reminder of sins. It is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins. (Hebrews 10:1–4)

But under the New Covenant, our sin has already been atoned for; the sacrifice has already been made. We sin—and it’s already taken care of. There’s nothing to do. In Jesus, it’s as if we have a prepaid gift card without a limit.

Day after day every priest stands and performs his religious duties; again and again he offers the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. But when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God, and since that time he waits for his enemies to be made his footstool. For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.

The Holy Spirit also testifies to us about this. First he says:
“This is the covenant I will make with them
after that time, says the Lord.
I will put my laws in their hearts,
and I will write them on their minds.”
Then he adds:
“Their sins and lawless acts
I will remember no more.”

And where these have been forgiven, sacrifice for sin is no longer necessary (Hebrews 10:11–18)

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bible, Religion, Theology | Leave a comment

Having Faith is Like Being Brave

In Sunday School for the last several weeks I’ve been taking the class through Hebrews 11 and the “great people of faith.”

The point of the chapter is to answer the question, “what is faith” and it does so by listing a bunch of folks from the Old Testament.

What is faith according to Hebrews 11? If all you do is quote the first couple of verses of the chapter and think that is the definition, you’re missing the point. Why do you suppose the author went on to list all those people? If you look only at the first couple of verses and ignore the overall context, you might imagine faith is some sort of a feeling: that somehow one has to scrunch up your face and keep telling yourself, like a self-affirmation, that you do believe, I do have hope, I do see evidence of stuff I cannot see. However, if you look at the Old Testament characters, you come to understand what the author really meant in those first couple of verses.

Guess what? Not one of those “mighty warriors of faith” operated without doubt, without resistance, without questioning and wondering and wishing they didn’t have to do what God told them to do. A lot of them spent time complaining to God about what they were going through and how it wasn’t working out. A lot of them kept going back to God and asking him, “are you sure?” For example, Moses and Gideon, according to Hebrews 11 did what they did “by faith.” But check out what Gideon was really like in Judges 6-8. Or look at Moses’ life and his responses to things in Exodus 3-5.

You see, what the people in Hebrews 11 have in common is not a lack of doubt. We generally don’t find them eagerly jumping at the chance to serve God. Usually they actually try to get out of it.

What the great people of faith have in common is that they kept on doing what God asked them to do, anyhow, even though they had doubts, and even though they didn’t really want to do it.

What is faith based on Hebrews 11? It is simply hearing what God wants you to do and then doing it, despite the doubts and your inner thoughts telling you “I don’t know if this is such a good idea.” It is akin to what Jesus said once:

“What do you think? There was a man who had two sons. He went to the first and said, ‘Son, go and work today in the vineyard.’

“ ‘I will not,’ he answered, but later he changed his mind and went.

“Then the father went to the other son and said the same thing. He answered, ‘I will, sir,’ but he did not go.

“Which of the two did what his father wanted?”

“The first,” they answered.

Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, the tax collectors and the prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God ahead of you. 32 For John came to you to show you the way of righteousness, and you did not believe him, but the tax collectors and the prostitutes did. And even after you saw this, you did not repent and believe him. (Matthew 21:28-32)

Faith isn’t a feeling. It is just doing what God asks, because it’s what you’ve been told to do and you know you’ve got to do it.

You have faith when it makes you do what you otherwise wouldn’t do. Faith is when you obey even though you’d rather just stay in bed today, thank you very much.

Faith is kind of like bravery. Bravery doesn’t mean you’re not scared. Bravery is doing what needs to be done despite being scared.

Faith is not the opposite of doubt. In fact, faith doesn’t exist without it, any more than bravery can exist without fear. Faith is doing what God asks of you, despite your doubt, your fear, and your reluctance.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bible, Religion, Theology | Leave a comment

Singularity

Benjamin Franklin was an intelligent, well-read individual, with an open and inquisitive mind. He was fascinated by science and contributed immensely to our understanding of electricity. More importantly, he was a major player in the creation of the United States.

I’ve occasionally wondered what a man like Benjamin Franklin would make of the United States today. How would he react it if he were somehow able to visit us?

The old television series Bewitched popped into the 1960s thanks to a bumbling Aunt Clara. He marveled over televisions and automobiles in the few hours he was there, but seemed to adapt readily enough.

Would the reality—if such could become real—match that fiction?

Probably not.

In the middle of the twentieth century, John von Neumann and Stanislav Ulam first described what is called “the technological singularity” or simply “the singularity.” They, along with later authors such as Verne Vinge and Ray Kruzweil argued that once artificially intelligent machines are created, their intelligence will grow exponentially, wildly surpass human capabilities, and usher in massive technological changes. The use of the term “singularity” to describe that future moment (predicted by Kurzweil and others to occur sometime between 2030 and 2045) is derived from physics and astronomy. A black hole is a post-supernova that has collapsed to a microscopic point of infinite mass called a singularity, from which nothing, not even light, can escape. It is a place where the laws of physics break down. It is radical break from the normal universe and incomprehensible to us.

Likewise, the advent of artificial intelligence is considered to be such a radical break from what has gone before that it will be incomprehensible to us.

Alvin Toffler wrote a best seller back in 1970 called “Future Shock.” He paralleled it with the concept of “culture shock”: the experience an individual has visiting a foreign country, where the familiar cues have shifted in unexpected ways. One summer while I was in college, I traveled oversees with a group of students. One of my fellow travelers couldn’t understand why the Swiss refused to take his money. He became angry that they insisted he exchange his dollars for Swiss Franks. Alvin Toffler argued that all of us were like my companion: but instead of visiting a foreign land, we were traveling into the future, a strange place from which we could never return, where everything we had grown accustomed was going to change—and the rate of change would only accelerate.

The singularity is not just in our future, however. We’re living in it now, for someone like Benjamin Franklin. Little of his world or experiences still exists.

He came from a place where people traveled on foot or horseback. Crossing an ocean was a perilous voyage on a wooden ship driven by wind. Nights were dark, with the gloom mollified barely by candles and oil lamps. The world was quiet, lacking the hums, droning televisions, and mechanical noises we hardly notice. Africans were slaves and women were second-class citizens with limited rights. Although he opposed slavery and found it morally reprehensible, he’d be startled that in the modern United States African Americans have the same rights as white men. To discover that the President of the United States was black and that there were several female senators would be mind-boggling.

The obvious technological changes would confuse and puzzle him. He’d be overwhelmed by everything from televisions to radios, electric lights to automobiles. Airplanes, rockets, satellites, people in orbit and robotic rovers on Mars would be the stuff of wild fantasy. Just the concept of robots, let alone that they were rolling about on another planet would shock him. The advances in our understanding of physics, astronomy, biology, medical science: it would all tax his comprehension. Perhaps one of the greatest wonders, from his perspective, would be to hear that not only had we conquered small pox—a dangerous and widespread illness in his day—we had eradicated it and it simply no longer existed.

He would not know how to cook a meal in a modern kitchen; freezers and refrigerators would be puzzling. Indoor toilets, hot and cold running water, central heating and air conditioning: beyond wonderful. The ease of daily bathing, deodorants, toothpaste, comfortable clothing and shoes—all new. Just the sort of clothes women wear on a warm summer day would shock and delight him.

Communication technology, the internet, online shopping, shopping centers, grocery stores: all beyond anything he could have ever imagined or believed possible. The sheer wealth of even the poorest of our citizens would amaze him.

That the United States had not only endured but prospered and retained its freedoms would startle him. The place of the United States in the world would be mind boggling: both its economic power—and the simple fact that all the armies, navies and air forces in all the world combined are smaller than ours and lack the capability of invading, let alone conquering us.

Franklin would be amazed, too, at just how peaceful our world is: crime in our cities is far lower than what he would have been familiar with (the crime rate in Los Angeles declined again last year—for the eleventh year in a row). War is rare. In fact, we live at the most peaceful time in world history, ever. Sixty-one percent of the world’s nations are relatively free, electoral democracies (118 out of 195 nations—up from only 69 in 1989 and maybe two in Franklin’s day). We also live in the most prosperous, best educated, most well-fed time in history, ever.

Benjamin Franklin would see the modern United States as a bountiful paradise. He would perhaps be most shocked that so many just don’t realize it.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Culture, Science, Technology | Leave a comment

Cosmic Microwave Background

Source SPACE.com: All about our solar system, outer space and exploration

Send to Kindle
Posted in Science, Space | Leave a comment